These days, if a helicopter is shot down in the
Beowulf says on page 97,
“Wise sir, do not grieve. It is always better to avenge dear ones than to indulge in the mourning. For every one of us, living in this world means waiting for our end. Let whoever can win glory before death.”
Therefore, it probably wasn't as common back then for people to sit around and cry because someone died, because death in battle was thought of as honorable. Besides death in battle, there was more death in general because of their lack of effective medicine, and because many died as infants, children, or birthing mothers.
Also, one's legacy was at stake. The reason why death in battle was seen as honorable was because it ensures that the person's reputation would be forever seen in good light; the last action of such a man would be defending his God, his religion, his freedom, the peace, his wife, and his children. And personally, I'd like to be frozen in history as a defender of those subjects.
1 comment:
I understand that death in the battlefield was the best way to die back then and that to do so was to die with honor and such, but I don't think that it was too much less common for people to be upset at the death of another back then. Sure, they died with honor, but they were still dead. When X person's father dies in battle, he still just lost his dad, and it's still sad.
It may have been a different kind of sadness, sure - when someone dies in war today, it's tragic, but back then, it was almost expected of warriors. Still, it was almost definitely a sad thing.
Post a Comment